York administrators no doubt thought they delivered a decisive blow to CUPE when their ploy to split the union, which was inexplicably but eagerly facilitated by a small but persistent faction of 3903’s bargaining team and exec, resulted in unit 2 voting to end their strike.
However, the broader CUPE membership of units 1 & 3 (and quite a few folks from unit 2) have risen to the occasion and are determined not to let either York administrators, or those few of our leaders who seem so eager to concede to and collaborate with the administration, sway our resolve. We have voted decisively, twice now, to stay out on strike until our three core demands are met:
- Tuition indexation.
- Minimum funding guarantees of $15,000 for unit 3 members.
- LGBTQ equity.
Let me address these issues one at a time.
1) Tuition indexation. This is one of the core strike issues because, unlike many universities elsewhere (including my previous institution, the University of California, where grad students pay no tuition when they teach or work for the university), York still requires it’s graduate student employees to pay large sums of money to tuition out of their pockets and/or pay. This is unusual even amongst other staff at York: one of the benefits for most York employees is free tuition if they decide to take classes!
There is a lot of confusion about what CUPE is asking for when we say “indexation.” That is because we aren’t even asking that grad students not have to pay tuition while working for York (though I think this would be quite reasonable). Instead, we are asking that tuition levels stay where they were prior to this academic year (prior to when York increased tuition by $7000 per year for incoming graduate students for 2014-15), effectively and unilaterally re-interpreting the 15 year-old indexation clause in CUPE contracts that has prevented them from raising tuition without a corresponding raise in funding. It is because of this huge and egregious hike in international fees that we are standing firm on requiring that York agree to new contractual language on indexation.
This is important because, since we already pay so much in tuition ($6000 per year for domestic students, $13,000, or now $20,000, for international students), if such provisions are not in place, York would be able to decrease our take home pay any time it wanted to simply by raising tuition (as it has shown it wants to do this year). It is also thus important to note that when York starts talking about the high hourly wages it pays us, they of course are not subtracting the tuition that comes directly out of that paycheck in order for us to stay enrolled (and thus keep our jobs). Quite the “company store” type scam, isn’t it?
2) Minimum funding guarantees of $15,000 for unit 3 members. Currently Unit 3 members earn $9600 before paying tuition. This means, in actuality, that Unit 3 domestic students take home $3600 after paying $6000 in fees, while international students still owe York either $3400 for tuition (for those of us who enrolled prior to 2014) or around $10,000 (for new international students). I can tell you all this for a fact: I am an international student in Unit 3, and this is my pay right now. I work a second job 10 hours/week, the maximum I’m allowed under Canadian immigration law (everyone on a student visa is limited to working 20 hours/week) on top of my classes and finishing my thesis, in order to be able to pay my rent and eat.
Yes, that’s right. York expects us to pay huge sums of money for the privilege of working for them, and it wants to have the ability to raise the amount of tuition when the “freeze” of these levels it has offered has expired in the future, potentially decreasing all Unit 3 (and Unit 1) take-home pay dramatically. This is why tuition indexation, combined with a reasonable minimum funding guarantee of $15,000 per year for Unit 3 members, are both core demands. One means nothing without the other.
3) LGBTQ equity. The establishment of LGBTQ as an equity category would mean, among other things, that York simply begins to keep track of how many employees identify as LGBTQ. This one is a tricky issue. Ideally, this would lead in the future to helping to ensure, alongside other intersectional analyses of deficiencies in hiring practices for instructors, that jobs aren’t only going to those with the most privilege and access. It is important when considering this language, however, in my opinion as a white queer person, that the creation of this category never be used as a way to have white LGBTQ folks gain access to equity positions at the expense of other groups, especially racial and ethnic minorities.
That’s it. Those are our “huge” core demands that York thinks are so unreasonable to meet.
Yesterday CUPE 3903 members had heard that York made gestures to resume bargaining. Our union said it was available to meet this morning (March 13). However, instead it seems that today York was more interested in it’s PR image than actually making an effort to resolve the strike by meeting CUPE’s ridiculously reasonable demands.
York’s PR team came out with an infographic trying to spin it’s offer to the union, an offer which has been soundly rejected in membership wide votes at two meetings so far this month (March 2 and March 9). Instead of returning to the bargaining table with an offer that actually addresses our core demands, York is still refusing to bargain fairly (indeed, at all), instead taking their infographic to social media, attempting to start the hashtag #fairoffer.
Grad students and undergrads alike howled at York’s inept attempt to spin their already rejected offers. I’ll leave a few of the best memes here for your enjoyment:
As our colleagues on strike with CUPE 3902 at the university of Toronto have noted with their own employer attempts to spin their bad offer, York is presenting misleading (if not outright erroneous) facts to the public in a campaign to make our rejection (twice) of their offer look unreasonable.
But it is York who is doing its best to be unreasonable. In fact, some of it’s latest moves – in addition to refusing to bargain in good faith while our bargaining team waits for York to join them at the table – are downright unscrupulous, if not illegal.
Here is a partial list of things the university is trying to do to end the strike rather than bargain fairly and make an offer that meets CUPE’s very modest demands:
- York administrators are pushing the Senate to resume classes even though a large portion of teaching and grading is performed by grad students still on strike. This is every university’s favourite tactic when doing their best to not bargain fairly with academic employees: pretend it is business as usual, even though the withdrawal of the strikers’ labor makes it impossible for classes to run well, if they can even run at all. If classes do resume, all students, grad students and undergrads alike, should know that they are protected by Senate policies from having to cross the picket lines. This includes not having to attend classes (either on or off campus) or turning in assignments. Professors are required to make these accommodations. See section 2.2, titled “Fairness to Students”:
-
students “are entitled to immunity from penalty, to reasonable alternative access to materials covered in their absence, to reasonable extensions of deadlines and to such other remedy as Senate deems necessary and consistent with the principle of academic integrity.”
- York administrators have begun trying to intimidate individual strikers into breaking the strike and returning to work (scabbing) through threats of retaliation: There have been reports from departments such as Biology and Engineering that members are being threatened that their jobs and/or academic funding such as scholarships will be rescinded if they fail to break the strike, or that professors in their department will penalize them, and their careers down the line, by refusing to write them letters of recommendation. These tactics are not only in bad form, they are illegal, and anyone facing recriminations such as these should contact CUPE immediately.
- York is actively seeking ways to have others do the work of striking CUPE members. This is another form of scabbing. Possible attempts to get others to scab include: telling non-striking faculty to do the work of strikers, hiring others (including undergrads) to do grading or teaching, and suggesting that undergrads should collectively run their own tutorials. Everyone, but undergrads in particular, should refuse these attempts. You are not paying the university to run your own classes!
- Earlier this week, York administrators called on the police to harass CUPE members who are on a legal strike.
- And of course, as mentioned above, York is focusing on PR campaigns rather than making a legitimate offer that would end the strike immediately.
As I have outlined above, it would be quite simple for York to end this strike. All they have to do is say, “yeah, you’re right, your really high fees of $6k/$13k per year are enough, so we’ll give you indexation. And yes, we shouldn’t discriminate against LGBTQ folks or have employees earning less than $15k per year before paying those high tuition fees.”
We aren’t asking for much. So please, York community, and the Senate in particular: support us. Pressure the fatcat administrators, many of whom are earning more than $300k per year to sit around and figure out ways not to bargain with us, to offer a fair deal that meets these very small demands.
How can you support us?
- Call on the administration, via phone, email, social media, in person protests at Kaneff tower, and any other way you can think of to meet CUPE demands
- Call on your professors, tenured and tenure track faculty, and all other voting members of the Senate, to vote no on resuming classes next week and until a fair and equitable deal has been reached. Over 10 departments have already openly asked for campus not to be resumed out of safety and workload concerns. This number should be higher, and the Senate has the power to follow their own “disruption” protocols not to resume classes.
These are the two key things right now. Thank you to everyone for all the amazing support you have shown so far, and please don’t give up on us!
2 Comments
Gloria Matei · March 16, 2015 at 8:21 am
There’s a type in paragraph 1) under tuition indexation. It should read “its students” instead of “it’s students.” The apostrophe is the problem.
kamichisholm · March 24, 2015 at 5:04 pm
thanks!